Since what not at stake just the intelligence and knowledge of the psychoanalyst, is his personality. Curiously, despite the number of psychoanalysts who have undergone a personal analysis, what we know, very little about the personality of the psychoanalyst, and certainly we have not a coordinated knowledge. One can imagine a research program, putting it will probably show a wide variety of types of people. If this hypothesis is correct, implies significant differences in the way the practice of psychoanalysis, without make them not valid the same goals can be reached by much other means, and the diversity of the patient behaves a certain variety of needs. It is also likely that, rather than the relative Uniformity of training, extended the same activities to standardize the subjection of the same situations and same tension originally different men tend to practice.
Addiction of the factors showed that the length of his experience psychotherapists over the similarity of their training and teaching, they belonged to come. In the absence of empirical data, we can conclude only. What does the practice of analysis? One receptive for the patient, the production of an atmosphere conducive to their communication or at least an atmosphere that is non-negative, the patient, to projecting the full meaning of their message, what on the suspension of the answers personal, the silence of the needs, emotions, settings, beliefs characteristic of the psychoanalyst. A suspension, but not a lock and ignorance, for the only way to neutralize their errors and to the exploitation of his readings is to recognize them. As for the most Professionals who work with the psyche the selection of candidates is made by psychiatrist clinical method: the candidate converses with two or more psychoanalysts, and they confront their views and opinions. Each carries the test in its own way. In general it is in agreement on certain points, such as culture, scientific training, vocational skills easier.