It discovered that the sad and melancholic skill of Jean, that in the start attracted in such a way it, was not about mere particularitity, of charm that combined with the appearance. The youngster really had psychological problems, perhaps in result of familiar traumas since tenra age (son of separate parents, problems with alcoholism, treasons, fight, etc.), and a propensity to the depression. Already he had attemped treatment, remedies, but were not afeito to such procedures, that soon abandoned. It felt a force bigger that everything, took that it to the isolacionismo, the solitude, the existencial emptiness, a feeling as that if to content in not being received and being wanted in the world. Camila already distrusted also that Jean had serious problems with drugs, that were not only one eventual consumer, as was the case of it. The independence of Camila did not allow that it tolerated great periods in second plain. How it was possible that it, always so requested and wanted for all, was as that in according to place in the life of Jean, as if the melancholy of it was more important? Exactly that these periods were temporary, they became each time more frequent, and to the long times excessively so that it supported. It started to appear jealousy and diffidence. Jean did not take care of of the relation, did not realimentava the love, it was not more affectionate. Mere question of time until it not to aguentar more, situation that already was noticed for all, and to decide to breach of time with Jean. He was very painful, but it had that to take the decision and to come back to be happy. She suffered very for some months. To forget Jean and to calm the emptiness that felt in its heart, as never before she had happened, started to smoke and to drink in surplus.
The quantitative psychology is much more simple that the qualitative one, but the human being not only is compound of mathematical or logical and experimental systems, but he goes much more there. In this sense, consensus has existed. The Socioconstruccionismo, that is not presented/displayed in the article of Takings Ibez, was defined by Kenneth Gergen like movement, a set of theoretical elements in pogresin, lax, abierto and with changing and vague contours, more than as a theoretical doctrine strongly coherent and stabilized. It privileges his instituting dimension over his instituted dimension, its character of process over his product character, more or less finished. The knowledge is in the mind of the individuals, neither the words are the reflection nor of the mind nor of a preexisting nature. Following Gergen, the main source of the words that we used on the world is in the social relation. From this angle which we called conociiento is not the product of individual minds, but of the social interchange; is not the fruit of the individuality but the one of the interdependence. (Gergen, 1989, p.19). Thus, the reality would be constructed in the significant interaction that they realise the human beings and, for this reason, moves away of the Positivismo that is limited to use, since I have commented previously, one methodology based on the observation, experimentation, contrast, etc. This constructed reality, of dynamic form, is internalizada by the individuals through the socialization. It introduces the historical factor and the interpretative character of the human being. The language like powerful constructor of the reality. As one has specified in the debate and following Ibez Takings, the construccionista perspective is that one that it rejects that it is the reality the one that dictates the speeches on the reality and that selects those that is adapted. The knowledge is, simply, relative. The construccionismo comes to dissolve to the subject dichotomy/object, affirming that no of these two organizations exists properly regardless of the other, do not constitute separated organizations, questioning the own concept of objectivity.