In the society contemporary, the media constitutes of the basic factors in the formation of what comumente it is known as public opinion. (…) when if it applies to a subject that presents a weak tradition of research in Brazil, (…) the contents of the news articles of the media have the permission to reign alone (…) what it is seen, read and ear, through the media (…), it tends if to become the only measure standard of truth for the great majority of the Brazilian population. (CARLINI-COTRIM; ' ' The media in the manufacture of the panic: a study in the Brasil' ' -, 2003) Findo this set of subtemas above-mentioned, with dimensions different, however representative on the subject, we perceive that the same ones corroborate with the initial interest of the group in clarifying the position of the media as factor associated with the alimentary upheavals. 3.0? General Objective method? To verify, in the present time, if the media is seen as factor associated with the alimentary upheaval in areas to multidiscipline that they study the subject. Specific objectives? To argue the paper of the cultural context in the alimentary upheavals (anorexy and bulimia) from a perspective to multidiscipline and multiprofessional; To know as the professionals they inside appraise the media of the generating cultural context of alimentary upheaval. Collection of data This study possesss character qualitative with the use of two techniques: a bibliographical revision (exploratrio study) more deepened and a proposal of interview half-structuralized (attached IV, on the subject, deriving of tables to multidiscipline (attached I the III) elaborated from this exploratrio study. In the first technique an ample bibliographical research of different dimensions on the considered subject was made. It had as objective to reach one better understanding of the alimentary upheavals and the factors to they associates. The conclusion of this technique assisted in the effectiveness of the job of second, that it dealt with the elaboration of a half-structuralized interview.
Once I was going to spend your holiday in Sicily. But then she changed her mind and decided that we should at least once to look at the famous Venice. Upon his return, and change the choice does not regret. So, first things first: The city on the water. The fact that Venice is like a Saint-Petersburg e is true, but not so much, yet is far richer than Venice canals, than the good old Peter. But the water is poor, unfortunately, in some places (as long as riding in a gondola) frankly smelled of sewage, and water can not be called pure. However, this is normal, the water-almost motionless, although in theory should vary sea-g. And of course, water – salt – drink it unnecessarily desire does not arise (a looking it is no desire at all:)). When I was stood duhoten terrible, so the need doused with cool water of a very urgent. But no fountains or sources, in contrast to all other tourist centers, where I go around was not observed. Only after careful study area have found two freshwater source: the Church of St. Zacharias and Santa Maria della Formosa. And in Venice is the only form of transport- river! Not very convenient, but brutally romantic! All other funds are absolutely useless: on the Venetian streets do not pass on any that I know of means of transport. Even the bike there unnecessarily, since almost all the bridges in Venice 'hooked' and comfortable for pedestrians equipped with stairs. So especially on a bike, then do not overclock. The fact that Venice goes under the water and slowly breaks down, they know everything. However, until you come directly on the site, do not realize the extent of destruction. It is a pity's incredible! The city actually has its own aura, and somehow magically pull-charm. And in Venice, almost no one lives. Remained a handful of fanatics and hometown patriots who are willing to tolerate enormous inconvenience for the sake of worldly harmony of water and stone. A poor man repaired to the apartment twice a year, because because of the wild humidity climbed all the plaster and cracks.
"In 1204, the Crusaders seized Constantinople army. Byzantium was divided into a number of states – the Latin Empire and the Achaean Principality created on the territories captured by the Crusaders, and the Nicene, Trebizond and Epirus Empire – remained under the control of the Greeks. "(Wikipedia) It turns out that the Byzantine Empire as the state ceased to exist, but who was his successor? Successor of the Byzantine Empire became Nicaean, at least, so says the modern history. Who rules Nike in 1237? "John III Ducas Vatats – Nicene emperor in 1221-1254, respectively." (Wikipedia). Letters, denoting the sound i in the Greek language is not as sound, so the name of the Emperor in the original sounds like "Batats." If you add the title of "Caesar" or "king", it becomes even clearer. What could lead to Russia Nicene Emperor? "History of Byzantium" (Vol. 3, collection) tells us: "During the summer of 1235 and Vatats Assen (Bulgaria) took a large part of the Latins Thrace. The boundary between Bulgaria and the Western Empire became possessions of the Nicene river Mariza in its lower reaches from the mouth to nearly Didimotiki. Violent Thracian fortress was besieged by the Latins Tsurul Vatatsem. In his campaigns against the Latins in 1235 and 1236's. Allies reached the walls of Constantinople. "From there, we know in the spring of 1237 the Bulgarian tsar Assen dissolved the alliance with the Nicene emperor. That same year, Pope, under the threat of a crusade, requires adherence to the Nicene emperor of the Roman Church.